top of page

Selected Talks

(Click on image to download PDF or access internet link)

2015

Invited talk, 2015

University of Hawaii at Manoa, Hawaii, USA

What affects the eruptive behaviour of volcanoes beneath glaciers?

          Subglacial eruptions are typically thought of as being explosive, generating abundant ash and powerful meltwater floods. A classic example is Eyjafjallajökull 2010 which grounded most European and some trans-Atlantic flights. However, not all subglacial eruptions are explosive, which begs the question: what affects the eruptive behavior of volcanoes beneath glaciers?

          I will present two cases studies. The first focuses on rhyolitic volcanism at Torfajökull, Iceland. Five edifices are compared which demonstrate contrasting styles of subglacial volcanism. The retained volatile content was used to reconstruct palaeo-ice thicknesses, however, no correlation was found with eruptive style. Instead, a strong correlation exists between explosivity and the pre-eruptive volatile content and degassing path, suggesting that behavior was controlled by magmatic degassing, in much the same way as subaerial eruptions, with ice playing a subsidiary role.

          The second case study is the 1918 basaltic eruption of Katla, Iceland. Samples have been collected that represent different times from the eruption and different depositional settings (air-fall and jökulhlaup). Variation exists in the retained volatile content, major and trace element chemistry, shard morphology and the cooling and degassing histories. We hope to determine the relative roles of magmatic and phreatomagmatic fragmentation for the different periods of the eruption.

Left: a rhyolitic tuya at Torfajökull (note the tents for scale). Right: the Mýrdalsjökull glacier which conceals the basaltic volcano Katla.

The degassing and fragmentation of Katla 1918: a cracking story or just a load of hot air?

Lancaster volcano-ice gathering, 2015

Lancaster, UK

Katla is a subglacial basaltic volcano and one of Iceland’s most notorious. It last erupted in 1918; the eruption was five times larger than Eyjafjallajökull 2010. However, little is understood on why this eruption was so powerful.

 

We have collected jökulhlaup and air-fall samples from this eruption. In both locations, layers were observed with varying grain sizes, which we have sampled from.

 

FTIR data suggests that the jökulhlaup samples quenched under elevated pressure. This could either represent ~130 m of water, ~120 m of ice or ~40 m of rock. In general the jökulhlaup clasts are very bubbly and have good quality glass. By comparison air-fall samples are generally more microlite and bubble rich, suggesting they had a slower cooling rate and longer to degas. However, many clasts have a bubble free margin, suggesting that the clast interiors were able to carry on degassing post-fragmentation. A magma-water heat transfer model (Woodcock et al., 2012) suggests that the clasts would have taken seconds to cool had they done so in water. Hotstage experiments have revealed a bubble growth rate of ~1 μm s-1 for typical eruptive temperatures, implying that bubbles would have been able to grow at most a few micrometers had the clasts quenched in water. We therefore suggest that clasts with a significant margin-core variation in bubble size have fragmented in air allowing longer cooling times with little/no interaction with water.

 

Many clasts, particularly from the jökulhlaup deposit, show evidence of there being clasts within them, often with significantly different bubble textures. We use these clasts to suggest that there were multiple episodes of fragmentation and vesiculation which could be explained by fragmentation taking place within the conduit and/or within close proximity to the vent and may explain the elevated pressure recorded by the FTIR data.

 

There are, however, a large variety of clast types which is apparent in both thin sections and SEM images of external textures. Some clasts show evidence of magma-water interactions whilst others are incredibly vesicular.

 

Geochemical data has determined that typical Katla 1918 clasts have a SiO2 content of ~47 wt.%. However there is a range of data with some clasts having up to ~74 wt.%. The distribution is bimodal which is supportive of historic and prehistoric Katla data and implies that the rhyolite was formed by late reheating and partial melting of basaltic crust (Lacasse et al., 2007). Some of the clasts show visual evidence of magma mingling, however this is less obvious in both the major and trace element chemistry.

 

Melt inclusions reveal significantly higher pre-eruptive S contents than matrix glass. The matrix glass data is varied but jökulhlaup samples generally have more retained than air-fall samples consistent with reports that phreatomagmatic samples retain higher S concentrations than magmatic tephra (Óladóttir et al., 2007). Rhyolite samples generally have lower S but higher concentrations of F and Cl.

 

Further work will involve SEM on thin section images to quantify bubble textures, produce bubble number densities and hopefully use these to calculate decompression rates.

 

Woodcock D. et al., (2012) J Geophys Res, 117(B10)

Lacasse C. et al., (2007) Bull volcano, 69: 373-399

Óladóttir B. et al., (2007) Ann of Glaciol, 45: 183-188

 

2014

What controls the explosivity of subglacial eruptions?

Invited talk, 2014

McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Katla 1918: the first pieces of the puzzle

Lancaster volcano-ice gathering, 2014

Lancaster, UK

Katla is one of Iceland’s most dangerous volcanoes. A large basaltic edifice residing under several hundred meters of ice, Katla is capable of producing powerful subglacial eruptions, which generate large volumes of fine ash and extraordinary meltwater floods. Furthermore, this is now the longest period between eruptions during historical records and following the recent eruption at Eyjafjallajökull, we need to prepare ourselves for the possibility of an imminent eruption at Katla.

 

The last Katla eruption was in 1918. It produced 0.7 km3 of airborne tephra (more than twice that of Eyjafjallajökull), and the 14th most powerful Quaternary flood on the planet (last 2.6 million years).

 

Various samples from the 1918 Katla deposits have been collected. I will analyse these to try and understand why Katla behaved the way that she did. What were the pre-eruptive magmatic conditions? What happened to the magma during ascent? Was ash production driven by magmatic or phreatomagmatic fragmentation? And how did the magma melt so much water so quickly?

 

Here, I will present preliminary data and findings; the first pieces of the Katla 1918 puzzle.

Katla - how to tame a Tröll

2013

Katla is one of Iceland’s most notorious volcanoes. It last erupted in 1918 and was over ten times more explosive than Eyjafjallajökull 2010, producing a 14 km high ash plume and devastating jökulhlaups. Now Katla is due to erupt again, so what lessons can we learn from the 1918 eruption? This presentation will summarise the main findings of my PhD on how volatiles and ice thickness affect the style of subglacial eruptions, and explain how I will use this knowledge and new skills to investigate Katla 1918. With improved understanding, we can plan better for the next eruption.

Lancaster volcano-ice gathering, 2013

Lancaster, UK

What controls the explosivity of subglacial rhyolitic eruptions in Iceland?

2012

VMSG, 2012

Durham, UK

     Eruptions from subglacial and ice-capped volcanoes can produce jökulhlaups (glacial floods) and large amounts of volcanic ash. Ash from such eruptions is damaging to both natural and socioeconomic environments, as demonstrated by the explosive 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption which cost the aviation industry $250 million per day. However, subglacial eruptions can demonstrate a wide variety of eruption styles from highly explosive to effusive. The controls on subglacial eruption styles are currently poorly understood, with magma composition, eruption rate, volatile content, degree of magma-water interaction, confining pressure, and ice thickness all being possible competing and contributing factors.

     In this presentation I will explore the relationship between volatile degassing and the style of subglacial rhyolitic eruptions at Torfajökull in south Iceland. Samples from a variety of eruptions ranging from large-volume explosive events to small-volume effusive events have been explored. Additionally dissolved volatile contents allow reconstruction of palaeo-ice thicknesses and syn-eruptive pressure changes; results show a clear difference between volatile degassing in effusive and explosive regimes, and reveal interesting parallels with subaerial rhyolitic eruptions.

 

Click here to access the abstract volume online.

2011

What controls the explosivity of subglacial rhyolitic eruptions in Iceland?

Invited talk

Oslo, Norway

Jacqueline Owen (Lancaster University) explains why 3 volcanoes in Iceland with the same type of magma had different styles of eruption.

 

Click here to watch on youtube

Volatile degassing during the subglacial rhyolitic eruption of Dalakvísl, Torfajökull, Iceland

Lancaster volcano-ice gathering, 2011

Lancaster, UK

Volatile degassing in subglacial rhyolitic eruptions: Evidence for palaeo-ice thicknesses and eruptive mechanisms

VMSG, 2011

Cambridge, UK

      For many decades volcanologists have been interpreting the lithofacies of subglacial volcanoes to reconstruct the thickness of ice covering a volcano at its time of eruption. However, for eruptions that did not pierce the ice sheet and become emergent, interpreting the elevation of this ice surface becomes very difficult. However, since the new millennium, a new technique has been developed in which the volatiles that are retained within the magma are used to reconstruct palaeoice thicknesses [1]. Typically, this is performed with water data as solubility-pressure relationships are well known.

         I have applied this technique to three subglacial rhyolitic volcanoes in Torfajökull (southern Iceland), producing the largest data-set to date for a volatile based reconstruction of palaeo ice thicknesses. At Bláhnúkur (a small volume, effusive and entirely subglacial eruption) I conclude that the ice was 400 m thick at the time of the eruption [2]; the water contents of the rocks at Dalakvísl (an entirely subglacial eruption that went through a transition in style), suggest that the ice was thicker here; but for SE Rauðfossafjöll (a large volume explosive eruption that pierced through the ice sheet) all the samples are completely degassed, which illustrates a limitation of the degassing method. The method is also limited by the large uncertainties that are associated with some of the parameters and therefore it is my opinion that the method should not be used quantitatively without additional constraints. 

      Volatiles do, however, shed light on pressure conditions and thus eruptive mechanisms, which has lead to new models for the construction of Bláhnúkur [2] and Dalakvísl. These involve intrusive formation of the Bláhnúkur lobes and a syneruptive jökulhlaup at Dalakvísl. Future work hopes to address the role that volatiles have in determining the eruptive behaviour of subglacial rhyolitic volcanoes; can volatiles explain the three different eruption styles seen at Bláhnúkur, Dalakvísl and SE Rauðfossafjöll?


[1] = Tuffen et al., (2010), [2] = Owen et al., (2012)

 

Click here to access the abstract volume online.

2010

A reconstruction of the paleao-ice thickness at Bláhnúkur, Torfajökull, Iceland, using volatile degassing

Lancaster volcano-ice gathering, 2010

Lancaster, UK

Subglacial rhyolitic volcanism in Iceland: the role of volatiles

2009

If you have any comments or questions, please post them on the bottom of the page or contact me

Lancaster volcano-ice gathering, 2009

Lancaster, UK

bottom of page